Men and women pulling “suitcases full of cash” started showing up at Seattle’s Sea-Tac Airport last year holding tickets for international flights bound for Africa.
Transporting large amounts of cash overseas is perfectly legal. But it was who was carrying the money … and where it was going that caught the attention of law enforcement, according to a report by KING 5, the local NBC affiliate for western Washington.
Those hauling the cash-laden cases were Somali-Americans who’d come to this country as refugees. They routinely send money back to Somalia. And many of the greenbacks headed to the jihadist-infested East African country come from welfare checks the refugees receive from the U.S. government, compliments of American taxpayers.
Carrying more than $10,000 while traveling out of the United States is legal as long as the traveler declares it by filling out a one-page federal form.
It was while looking at these slips of paper that terrorism expert Glenn Kerns found a disturbing pattern.
“The thing was the amount, the staggering amount,” said Kerns, a Seattle police officer who was assigned to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force for 14 years before he retired in December.
The cash couriers were working for hawalas – businesses that derive their name from the Arabic word for “transfer.” Hawalas are part of a traditional system of banking in Shariah-compliant Muslim communities.
Seattle and King County are home to the fourth largest Somali community in the United States. More than 132,000 Somalis have come to the U.S. as “refugees” since 1983, with more than 60 percent arriving since the late 1990s.
The Somali refugees continue to arrive in the U.S. at a rate of 750 a month, placed in dozens of U.S. cities including Seattle, San Diego, Minneapolis, Atlanta, Lewiston, Maine; Fargo, North Dakota; Boise and Twin Falls, Idaho; and Columbus, Ohio, among other places.
Many use the hawalas to send money back to their families in Somalia.
But is all of it going to downtrodden family members?
That’s the question Kerns wanted the U.S. government to investigate.
It would make sense, since Somalia is home to an active jihadist rebellion from al-Shabab, an al-Qaida affiliate that slaughters Christians in neighboring Kenya and seeks to establish an ISIS-like caliphate in East Africa.
“(They) have Al Shabaab, which has been designated a terrorist organization, and our concern is how much money is going to them?” Kerns told KING 5.
Kerns said the first cash shipment rolled through Sea-Tac early last year. A man carrying $750,000 in cash told Customs officials he was transporting the money overseas. Over the next few months couriers carrying as much as $2 million boarded commercial flights at Sea-Tac.
One Seattle hawala sent out $20 million last year, said Kerns.
If it’s happening in Seattle, it’s likely happening in Minneapolis, Columbus, San Diego and other cities where large Somali communities have been resettled by the U.S. government in cooperation with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
Which leads to the next set of logical questions: Where is all this money coming from and why isn’t the federal government interested in investigating where it’s going?
U.S. banks have gradually phased out the wiring of money on behalf of hawalas because they don’t want to be held liable for failing to report suspicious activity.
In March 2015 the last bank serving hawalas – Merchants – shut down the last remaining accounts of hawalas that wired money to Somalia, KING 5 reported. That left the hawalas with no other option but to ferry cash overseas the old-fashioned way – in the suitcases of their customers.
Kerns analyzed hawala financial records filed with the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions.
He investigated the 10 clients who transferred the most money through hawalas last year and what he found was astounding.
“All 10 of them were on welfare benefits. DSHS benefits,” Kerns told KING 5. “It’s fraud. Straight up fraud – every one of them.”
Kerns said he, along with an agent from a federal agency he would not disclose, took their case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Seattle.
“They don’t want to touch it,” said Kerns. “My opinion – I believe it’s because it will look like they’re targeting a certain population.”
Hassan Diis believes that Somali-Americans are already being “targeted” for discrimination.
Diis told KING 5 he has been working with lawmakers to try to restore banking services for Somali hawalas. Diis says banks and law enforcement have placed unfair restrictions on hawalas that are harming ordinary, hardworking people.
“Delivering money is one of the biggest challenges (Somali) people face,” Diis told the TV station.
These statements from Diss underscore the influence and power of Shariah law within the global Islamic community, including the one right here in America, says Philip Haney, co-author of the new book “See Something Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government’s Submission to Jihad” with veteran WND journalist Art Moore.
“This ‘concern’ about ‘unfair restrictions’ has been the basis of every attempt of Muslim Brotherhood front groups to overturn cases such as the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial,” Haney, a former DHS investigator who retired last year, told WND.
This trial sent dozens of Brotherhood members to jail and led to its front groups, such as the Council for American-Islamic Relations or CAIR being labeled as unindicted co-conspirators in a plot to transfer money overseas to Hamas, a designated foreign terror group.
Al-Shabab in Somalia is on that same list of terrorist organizations. Obama’s Justice Department shut the Holy Land Foundation trial down in 2009 despite its success in rooting out an underground network of financial donors to Hamas under the cover of “charity.”
Afraid of offending Muslims
The Obama administration’s overriding fear of interfering with Muslim “charity” — which is one of the Five Pillars of Islam known as Zakat — was also exposed by a little-known entry buried in the Federal Register on Feb. 5, 2014. This change in policy was not processed through Congress or even highlighted by a presidential executive order. Nobody from the media noticed it but it carried great weight in changing the way federal agents like Haney did their jobs. In one fell swoop it negated their ability to stop jihadist sympathizers from entering the U.S. or from claiming taxpayer benefits once they are here.
It showed up as an obscure amendment to what is known as the “terrorism inadmissibility grounds” or TRIG within the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Read the entry in the Federal Registry that resulted in sweeping changes in the way federal agents are able to screen out radical Islamists from entering the U.S.
The decree gave the attorney general, the secretary of Homeland Security and the secretary of state “discretion” to ignore financial contributions by immigrants to known terrorist outfits if it was determined these donations amounted to “limited material support” and were “routine social transactions” carried out in the “satisfaction of certain well-established or verifiable cultural obligations.”
“The terms ‘routine transaction’ and ‘well-established cultural obligations’ are legalese for zakat (Islamic charity), which became the focus of a barrage of disinformation after the Holy Land Foundation was indicted on July 26, 2004 for financial support of Hamas,” Haney said.
A curious statement from Obama on ‘zakat’
This DHS-DOJ ruling, as entered in the Federal Registry, was a partial fulfillment of President Obama’s pledge during his historic “A New Beginning” speech in Cairo, when he declared:
“Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which we protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation. That is why I am committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill Zakat.”
Why is this even important? Haney believes he knows why.
“Because Shariah law demands that 1/8 of all Zakat must go to the support of the Mujahidin (jihad fighters), wherever they may be in the world,” he said. “Do you suppose President Obama might have known this, when he used the word zakat in his speech?”
Sources within the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Seattle, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Kerns’ investigation had too many “holes” to proceed with criminal charges.
That was the same reaction Haney said he got when federal authorities learned of his book “See Something Say Nothing,” which chronicles the evolution of Homeland Security from an agency that once put protection of Americans first into one that is now more concerned about protecting the civil rights and civil liberties of the Muslim immigrant community. This despite the fact that Haney fully documented his allegations with primary sources and original documents.
Bankers also falling in line
The banking industry also seems to be in bed with Muslim interests.
Washington Bankers Association President Jim Pishue told KING 5 his member banks sympathize with the hawalas who are “struggling” under the scrutiny of international regulators and anti-terrorism agencies.
He said federal laws make it “very burdensome” for any bank to send money on behalf of the hawalas to countries like Somalia.
It’s expensive for banks to monitor the accounts, and there’s the risk of being held liable if the feds determine a bank hasn’t done an adequate job. He said Congress needs to create a better environment for Somali money transfers.
That way Zakat will continue to flow, uninterrupted and undeterred, straight into the hands of al-Shabab in Somalia.